Additive ManufacturingAutomotive AM

Tesla is working with multiple 3D printed sand casting companies

Breakthrough centers on how giant molds are designed and tested for mass production

Stay up to date with everything that is happening in the wonderful world of AM via our LinkedIn community.

Remember when, in 2020, we were the first media to show you the massive generatively designed cast part created by Tesla for the Model Y? There were no clear indications that the part was produced using 3D printed sand casting but it was very likely since it enabled the company to reduce 70 components into a single one. Now, according to an article from Reuters, Tesla’s casting innovations do center on sand 3D printing (such as the technologies described in VoxelMatter’s Traditional Ceramic and Sand AM Market Report 2023).

The leading news portal cites five different persons from design and casting specialists in Britain, Germany, Japan and the United States. All spoke to Reuters on condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to speak to the media. The breakthrough Tesla has made centers on how the giant molds for such a large part are designed and tested for mass production, and how casts can incorporate hollow subframes with internal ribs to cut weight and boost crashworthiness.

According to the detailed Reuters article, so far, automakers have shied away from casting ever-bigger structures because of the “gigacast dilemma”: creating molds to make parts of 1.5 meters squared or more boosts efficiency but is expensive and comes with myriad risks.

Once a large metal test mold has been made, machining tweaks during the design process could cost $100,000 a go, or redoing the mold altogether might come to $1.5 million, according to one casting specialist. Another said the whole design process for a large metal mold would typically cost about $4 million.

That has been deemed prohibitive by automakers – especially as a design might need half a dozen tweaks or more to achieve a perfect die from the perspective of noise and vibration, fit and finish, ergonomics and crashworthiness, the sources said.

Tesla is working with multiple 3D printed sand casting companies how giant molds are designed and tested for mass production
Images source: Tesla

But Musk’s vision from the start was to find a way to cast the underbody in one piece, despite the risks, the sources said.

To overcome the obstacles, Tesla turned to firms that make test molds out of industrial sand with 3D printers. The complete list of these companies is available on VoxelMatters’ Directory and in the market report mentioned above. Using a digital design file, printers known as binder jets deposit a liquid binding agent onto a thin layer of sand and gradually build a mold, layer by layer, that can die-cast molten alloys.

According to one Reuters’ source, the cost of the design validation process with sand casting, even with multiple versions, is minimal – just 3% of doing the same with a metal prototype. The value proposition of 3D printed sand casting is also described in detail in VoxelMatter’s report.

That means Tesla can tweak prototypes as many times as needed, reprinting a new one in a matter of hours using machines from companies such as Desktop Metal (DM.N) and its unit ExOne, or German company voxeljet and several other Chinese companies operating in the Chinese market.

The design validation cycle using sand casting only takes to two to three months, two of the Reuters’ sources said, compared with anywhere from six months to a year for metal mold prototypes.

Research
Composites AM 2024

746 composites AM companies individually surveyed and studied. Core composites AM market generated over $785 million in 2023. Market expected to grow to $7.8 billion by 2033 at 25.8% CAGR. This new...

Davide Sher

Since 2002, Davide has built up extensive experience as a technology journalist, market analyst and consultant for the additive manufacturing industry. Born in Milan, Italy, he spent 12 years in the United States, where he completed his studies at SUNY USB. As a journalist covering the tech and videogame industry for over 10 years, he began covering the AM industry in 2013, first as an international journalist and subsequently as a market analyst, focusing on the additive manufacturing industry and relative vertical markets. In 2016 he co-founded London-based VoxelMatters. Today the company publishes the leading news and insights websites VoxelMatters.com and Replicatore.it, as well as VoxelMatters Directory, the largest global directory of companies in the additive manufacturing industry.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button
Close Popup
Privacy Settings saved!
Privacy Settings

When you visit any web site, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. Control your personal Cookie Services here.

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems.

Technical Cookies
In order to use this website we use the following technically required cookies
  • PHPSESSID
  • wordpress_test_cookie
  • wordpress_logged_in_
  • wordpress_sec

Decline all Services
Save
Accept all Services

Newsletter

Join our 12,000+ Professional community and get weekly AM industry insights straight to your inbox. Our editor-curated newsletter equips executives, engineers, and end-users with crucial updates, helping you stay ahead.