AM ResearchAM SoftwareMetal Additive Manufacturing

NC State improves finishing time for 3D printed machine parts

Allowing users to identify potential flaws without having to remove the parts from the printer

Stay up to date with everything that is happening in the wonderful world of AM via our LinkedIn community.

According to North Carolina State University (NC State), researchers have demonstrated a technique that allows for the automated quality control of metal 3D printed machine parts. The technique allows users to identify potential flaws without having to remove the parts from the printer.

“One of the reasons people are attracted to 3D printing and other additive manufacturing technologies is that these technologies allow users to quickly replace critical machine components that are otherwise difficult to make outside of a factory,” said Brandon McConnell, an assistant research professor in NC State’s Edward P. Fitts Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, and co-corresponding author of a paper on the work. “And additive manufacturing tools can do this as needed, rather than dealing with supply chains that can have long wait times. That usually means using 3D printing to create small batches of machine parts on demand.”

After a metal machine part is printed, it requires additional finishing and has to be measured to ensure the part meets critical tolerances. Currently, this process involves taking a part out of the relevant manufacturing equipment, measuring it, and then putting it back into the manufacturing equipment to make modest adjustments. “This may need to be done repeatedly, and can take a significant amount of time,” said McConnell. “Our work here expedites that process.”

Specifically, the researchers have integrated 3D printing, automated machining, laser scanning, and touch-sensitive measurement technologies with related software to create a largely automated system that produces metal machine components that meet critical tolerances.

How it works

After 3D printing the metal part, including support structures, machine operators take the printed piece and mount it on a finishing device using the support structure. At this point, lasers scan the mounted part to establish its dimensions. A software program then uses these dimensions and the desired critical tolerances to guide the finishing device, which effectively polishes out any irregularities in the part. As this process moves forward, the finishing device manipulates the orientation of the printed part so that it can be measured by a touch-sensitive robotic probe that ensures the part’s dimensions are within the necessary parameters.

To test the performance of the new approach, researchers manufactured a machine part using conventional 3D printing and finishing techniques, and then manufactured the same part using their new process.

“We were able to finish the part in 200 minutes using conventional techniques; we were able to finish the same part in 133 minutes using our new technique,” said McConnell. “Depending on the situation, saving 67 minutes could be incredibly important. Time is money in most professional settings. And in emergency response contexts, for example, it could be the difference between life and death.”

The researchers note that this work focuses on printing and finishing machine parts that include circles or cylinders, such as pistons. However, the approach could be adapted for machine parts with other features.

“All of the hardware we used in this technique is commercially available, and we outline the necessary software clearly in the paper – so we feel that this new approach could be adopted and put into use almost immediately,” said McConnell. “And we are certainly open to working with partners who are interested in making use of this technique in their operations.”

The paper, titled ‘Automatic Feature Based Inspection and Qualification for Additively Manufactured Parts with Critical Tolerances’, was published in the International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management. The first author of the paper is Christopher Kelly, a graduate student at NC State who now works for Celonis, Inc. The paper was co-authored by Richard Wysk, professor emeritus in the Fitts Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering; Ola Harrysson, Edward P. Fitts Distinguished Professor in the Fitts Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering; and Russell King, the Henry L. Foscue Distinguished Professor of Industrial and Systems Engineering at NC State.

The work was done with support from the US Army Research Office, under grant number W911NF1910055.

Composites AM 2024

746 composites AM companies individually surveyed and studied. Core composites AM market generated over $785 million in 2023. Market expected to grow to $7.8 billion by 2033 at 25.8% CAGR. This new...

Edward Wakefield

Edward is a freelance writer and additive manufacturing enthusiast looking to make AM more accessible and understandable.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button
Close Popup
Privacy Settings saved!
Privacy Settings

When you visit any web site, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. Control your personal Cookie Services here.

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems.

Technical Cookies
In order to use this website we use the following technically required cookies
  • wordpress_test_cookie
  • wordpress_logged_in_
  • wordpress_sec

Decline all Services
Accept all Services


Join our 12,000+ Professional community and get weekly AM industry insights straight to your inbox. Our editor-curated newsletter equips executives, engineers, and end-users with crucial updates, helping you stay ahead.