3D Printing ProcessesAdditive ManufacturingMetal Additive ManufacturingMetals

Elementum 3D brings 6061 and 2024 aluminum into L-PBF using reactive in-situ ceramics

Process chemistry targets hot-tearing in legacy alloys with higher deposition rates on EOS M290

Stay up to date with everything that is happening in the wonderful world of AM via our LinkedIn community.

Elementum 3D is extending LPBF to legacy high-strength aluminum grades by synthesizing ceramic reinforcements during printing. The company’s reactive additive manufacturing, or RAM, mixes heat-producing materials into the feedstock so that tiny ceramic particles are created right where the laser is working. Those particles act as potent nucleants, shifting solidification from columnar to fine, equiaxed grains and reducing hot-tearing that typically undermines alloys such as 2024 and 6061 in fusion processes.

The firm describes an energy-balance approach to size these reactions, using tabulated heat capacities, heats of formation and latent heats from NIST and JANNAF data sets. By adjusting the reaction heat and the amount of matrix, RAM aims to reduce the amount of laser energy required to produce ceramic materials from precursors that melt at lower temperatures. The company claims that the outcome is metal-matrix composites with nearly perfect density and evenly shaped microstructures, which are rare in fusion-based

EOS M290 on the rocks

Elementum 3D made aluminum 2024 and 6061 versions with 2 vol% ceramic using an EOS M290 system and says they print well and respond to heat treatment like regular aluminum. In tests with 10 vol% ceramic, 2024 samples demonstrated strong strength and durability, and their break points did not exhibit the cracking observed in non-RAM builds. The microstructure has two different sizes of ceramic particles, about 200–800 nanometers and 5–20 micrometers, mixed throughout the material, which helps explain the consistent mechanical properties observed.

Deposition productivity is also cited as a benefit. On the same EOS platform, three RAM materials reportedly exceeded the deposition rate of AlSi10Mg, with A6061-RAM2 more than doubling throughput. Specific layer-rate or volumetric build-rate figures were not provided, nor were parameter sets, but the company states that increased deposition translated to lower part costs.

Applications in aerospace

Application examples point to near-term use in aerospace. With permission from Ball Aerospace, the company highlights an anodized A6061-RAM2 lattice mirror blank and a chromate-coated spacecraft bracket. A 2024-based piston head and a 6061-based stator vane illustrate the combination of thin-wall features, internal cooling channels and higher-temperature wear and fatigue performance associated with the ceramic-reinforced matrices.

Some key technical details remain to be documented. The material description mentions common processing methods for wrought alloys but does not provide complete information on heat-treatment schedules, strength measurements, fatigue data, or thermal conductivity. Building parameter windows, porosity statistics, and quantified deposition rates would further clarify where RAM-modified 2024 and 6061 can substitute for conventional AlSi10Mg or wrought stock in production and how the strength–ductility trade-off evolves as ceramic volume fraction increases.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button